Showing posts with label rudolph giuliani. Show all posts
Showing posts with label rudolph giuliani. Show all posts

Friday, May 18, 2007

The Country is Ailing...we need a DOCTOR, not a crossdressing multimillionaire

Our Country is AILING, we need a Doctor, like Dr. Ron Paul, not a crossdressing multimillionaire like Rudy "Too Much Rouge" Giuliani!

Thursday, May 17, 2007

Nation Defends Ron Paul vs. Giuliani

http://www.freemarketnews.com/WorldNews.asp?nid=41395
"Rudy Giuliani made clear in Tuesday night's Republican presidential debate that he is not ready to let the facts get in the way of his approach to foreign policy. The most heated moment in the debate, which aired live on the conservative Fox News network, came when the former New York mayor and current GOP front-runner angrily refused to entertain a serious discussion about the role that actions taken by the United States prior to the September 11, 2OO1, terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon may have played in inspiring or encouraging those attacks. Giuliani led the crowd of contenders on attacking Texas Congressman Ron Paul after the anti-war Republican restated facts that are outlined in the report of the The National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States. -Nation "

MORE ON CROSSDRESSING "TOO MUCH ROUGE" GIULIANI




WHEN YOU SEE "TOO MUCH ROUGE" RUDY GIULIANI ON TV...

REMEMBER, THIS IS HIS OTHER LOOK
(SEE BOTH OF HIM TO THE LEFT)

WHY DOES RUDOLPH GIULIANI DRESS IN DRAG?


THIS IS RUDOLPH GIULIANI. IT IS NOT PHOTOSHOPPED...BUT IS INSTEAD, ONE OF THE MANY PICTURES DOCUMENTING HIS CROSSDRESSING. JON STEWART ON THE DAILY SHOW, HAS SHOWN MANY OF THE PICTURES OF "RUDY" DRESSING IN PUBLIC IN WOMEN'S CLOTHES.
THE QUESTION BECOMES, DO YOU REALLY WANT GIVE THE HIGHEST POSITION TO THE LAND FOR HIM TO PRANCE AROUND IN THE WHITEHOUSE DRESSED IN A FRILLY OUTLANDISH OUTFIT?
HOW WOULD YOU LIKE HIM TO RECEIVE THE AMBASSADOR OF RUSSIA DRESSED IN A EASTER DRESS, LOADED TO THE HILT IN ROUGE AND LIPSTICK ?
I don't care if you are a Republican or not, I think "a little blue dress" worn by Giuliani, would be much worse than the "little blue dress" in the Clinton mess.
I think "Judy Judy Judy" RUDY GIULIANI should get a new nickname...
"TOO MUCH ROUGE" RUDY GIULIANI...THE CROSSDRESSING CANDIDATE!

RON PAUL IS RIGHT and is the FRONTRUNNER

Ron Paul is right. This is both a statement about his political leaning, and his correctness.

The only problem with Ron is that he hasn't had millions to spend on advertising (unlike


"Judy Judy Judy" Giuliani, who has been photographed numerous times wearing women's clothes...see this one...(Photo found at http://www.silt3.com/photos/giuliani_in_drag.jpg )


http://www.freemarketnews.com/Linked-Commentary.asp?nid=7531


Above picture is Rudy Giuliani
in one of his times he dresses
in women's clothes


"Giuliani’s Attack on Ron Paul Falls Flat
by Jacob G. Hornbergerby Jacob G. Hornberger

window.onerror=function(){clickURL=document.location.href;return true;}
if(!self.clickURL) clickURL=parent.location.href;
DIGG THIS
Ron Paul once again roiled Republican presidential politics on the issue of foreign policy during last night’s debate, finishing second in the post-debate poll conducted by Fox News and first in the poll conducted by MSNBC.
Pointing out that U.S. foreign policy is the root cause of the anger and hatred that has engendered terrorism against the United States, including the 9/11 attacks, Paul suggested that America would be better off ending the U.S. government’s role as world policeman as wells its longtime policy of interventionism. He pointed to Vietnam as an example of where 60,000 American men died in a senseless war while today Americans are instead peacefully investing and trading with the Vietnamese despite their communist regime.
Paul’s point ignited an attack by former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani, who indignantly announced that he had never heard such a theory in his life and asked Paul to retract it. Instead, Paul steadfastly stood his ground, pointing out that the CIA itself has pointed out the “blowback” that U.S. foreign policy has engendered. He cited the CIA’s installation of the shah of Iran in 1953 for producing the blowback that resulted in the taking of the U.S. hostages in Iran many years later.
In a post-debate interview, Giuliani clarified his point by reciting the official U.S. canard that was issued immediately after the 9/11 attacks – that the terrorists hate us for our “freedom and values.” Giuliani suggested that it was because of our “freedom of religion” and “freedom for women.”
When Paul mentioned Iran as an example of blowback from U.S. foreign policy, he was referring to the 1953 coup in which the CIA secretly and surreptitiously engineered the ouster of the democratically elected prime minister of Iran, Mohammed Mossadegh, who had been selected Time Magazine’s Man of the Year. In his place, the CIA installed the shah of Iran, whose secret police proceeded to terrorize and torture the Iranian people for the next 25 years, with the ardent support of the U.S. government. As the Iranian people discovered the U.S. government’s role in all this, their anger and rage ultimately erupted in 1979 with the Iranian Revolution and the taking of the U.S. hostages. "